What is relevant in Art today
OUR STANDPOINTS AND QUESTIONS
van Chapman -Philosophic Community Projects -
www.naturestudio.net
If one is concerned with the style of frames on a painting, for example, if they are modern or not in style, is that relevant to the world today?
It is not because a form is modern in style that is true in the spirit. But if an art is timeless, the other way around is true.
If a work is true and beautiful in spirit and form, it is always actual.
I am not prejudicing a work because it is modern. That is in fact the meaning of my Abstract Waterforms 1 video, to convey how abstract can be an aspect of nature, and a work based on abstract forms like this, can be spiritual in the sense that it can help people to see what is. See the overwhelming beauty and richness we have in nature, which the world is destroying if it does not see. Can you guarantee me that modern art is not prejudicing fine spiritual works ( like those of Myriam Vandenberghe), simply because they are not modern in style??
Is it relevant to the world, for example, a work , even if modern in style, when it only adds to the existing pollution and insensibility of the world ? For example producing Cloacas, for example, excrements out of good food, as art, in a world where people are dying of hunger, or tattooing pigs in a world animals like these live in dungeons only for consumption, without the right for a life, is this more spiritual and relevant to the world today?
I am here to listen and try to understand, because as I see, for someone to label a work which expresses a profound state of communion with nature and life as a 'mere decoration', simply because it is not modern in style, is indeed an unjust, tragic-comic projection.
A true, just or kind spirit is still good, without a form.
But what is a form, however modern, without a true spirit?
If a work is about form, or a style, and never mind the spirit, the justice, the truth, never mind the health the life or peace in this world, even though it is modern, is it relevant contemporary art?
Without the sensibility which true love gives to us, is any work relevant to the world?
When a true spirit takes form, no matter the style, it is art.
Once I heard the question: -" Can Art save the world ?". What can save the world is not a matter of taste but of consciousness. It is Not a mode, a style of Art, but to unite a true, kind and just spirit in action, in whatever work we do. To be humble enough to see what is, and not prejudge anyone, anything; not even out of belief.
There is nothing substantially new in a work of art, or revolution, when you substitute one vanity of power for another, one prejudice for another.
van Chapman
-Philosophic Community Projects -
True angels destroy not men, but the falseness in them.
www.naturestudio.net
A DIALOGUE ABOUT ART
TO CANVAS TV
www.naturestudio.net.
Since Marcel DuChamp, with his urinoir, we have noticed, it seems modern artists spend a lot of time in the toilet!
They never seem to be tired to look in there for things to exhibit in museums,- from the metal tube structures and toilet accessories, furniture to bodily matter, sex organs, bones, tissues, fats, fluids dirty baby napies, to the very Cloaka of Delvoye, apparently fascinated by excreting activities, for all that, with a solid CONCEPT backing it, yes, is modern.
Similarly, most expressions of graffiti or rap-pop-contemporary artists are as the body language of those teen agers seduced by the tough guys of a street gang, proud of their insensitive, arrogant attitudes and foul language, mostly copied from the others, expressions from the excrements of language as 'fucking' with every other sentence, 'shit', 'God damn ' ('Godverdomme'), or 'fuck off', because that is 'COOL" or 'IN'.
And like these teenagers, many contemporary art exponents turn their nose up at, and look down upon those who do not follow them.
If I would think artists to be pioneers, seeing the often cold and gloomy expressions of many of the 'Avant Garde' artists today, like sculptures of bodies smashed inside building materials we saw on Canvas TV, the future would look somber indeed.
Myriam Vandenberghe and I agree that only through the consciousness of love one can see the beauty of Nature and also the ugliness and stupidity of vanity, of greed, arrogance, which to the immature mind is so 'cool'.